Prepared by Verasight

Verasight September National Survey: Prediction Markets

Survey results from a nationally representative sample of US adults aged 18+.

1,500 respondents
September 16–21, 2026
4 questions

Key Takeaways

Q1

Prediction Market Familiarity

Before today, had you heard of prediction markets — websites where people can bet money on things like elections, interest rates, or who will win an award?

(N = 1,500)
9%
69%
22%
Yes, and I've used oneYes, but I've never used oneNo, I hadn't heard of these

Demographic Crosstabs

Response18-2930-4950-6465+
Yes, and I've used one15%13%4%2%
Yes, but I've never used one71%66%68%71%
No, I hadn't heard of these14%20%27%26%

Weighted column percentages.

Q2

Trust in Information Sources

How much do you trust each of these to give you accurate information about the economy and about what's likely to happen?

(N = 1,500)
A great deal
A fair amount
Not much
Not at all
Not sure
Federal government agencies
A great deal
5%
A fair amount
34%
Not much
36%
Not at all
21%
Not sure
3%
National news organizations
A great deal
7%
A fair amount
37%
Not much
31%
Not at all
21%
Not sure
3%
Public opinion polls
A great deal
5%
A fair amount
37%
Not much
39%
Not at all
16%
Not sure
4%
Betting markets (where people wager money on future events)
A great deal
4%
A fair amount
16%
Not much
30%
Not at all
39%
Not sure
10%
Social media
A great deal
4%
A fair amount
20%
Not much
40%
Not at all
33%
Not sure
3%
Your own experience and people you know
A great deal
25%
A fair amount
53%
Not much
14%
Not at all
4%
Not sure
4%

Demographic Crosstabs

Federal government agencies
Response18-2930-4950-6465+
A great deal9%5%4%3%
A fair amount40%29%30%38%
Not much35%35%40%36%
Not at all13%25%24%21%
Not sure4%5%2%3%
National news organizations
Response18-2930-4950-6465+
A great deal11%6%5%8%
A fair amount44%36%31%38%
Not much28%32%33%30%
Not at all14%22%28%21%
Not sure3%4%2%3%
Public opinion polls
Response18-2930-4950-6465+
A great deal5%6%5%3%
A fair amount41%37%32%36%
Not much34%38%40%41%
Not at all14%14%20%16%
Not sure5%5%3%4%
Betting markets (where people wager money on future events)
Response18-2930-4950-6465+
A great deal4%7%2%1%
A fair amount15%21%19%10%
Not much28%32%30%29%
Not at all43%32%39%46%
Not sure9%9%10%14%
Social media
Response18-2930-4950-6465+
A great deal9%4%3%3%
A fair amount29%22%17%11%
Not much41%38%42%40%
Not at all18%32%37%43%
Not sure3%4%2%4%
Your own experience and people you know
Response18-2930-4950-6465+
A great deal26%25%27%24%
A fair amount50%51%53%56%
Not much17%15%12%13%
Not at all4%5%5%3%
Not sure4%4%3%4%

Weighted column percentages.

Q3

Polls vs. Betting Markets

Imagine it's a week before an election. A well-known public opinion poll shows Candidate A ahead. At the same time, a betting market, where people wager real money on the outcome, has Candidate B as the favorite. Which do you think is more likely to be right about who wins?

(N = 1,500)
The poll
28%
The betting market
21%
They're equally likely to be right
30%
Not sure
21%

Demographic Crosstabs

Response18-2930-4950-6465+
The poll33%26%26%29%
The betting market18%24%21%18%
They're equally likely to be right30%30%32%29%
Not sure18%20%21%24%

Weighted column percentages.

Q4

Most Trusted Election Forecaster

If you wanted to know who was going to win a big election, which of these would you trust most? Order these options by how much you trust them, with 1 being the most trusted.

(N = 1,500)
ItemRanked 1stRanked 2ndRanked 3rdRanked 4thRanked 5thRanked 6thTop 3
Experts and analysts on the news33%22%16%13%8%8%71%
Public opinion polls24%28%20%14%8%6%72%
Talking to people you know20%17%19%20%15%9%56%
Betting markets11%11%15%16%20%27%37%
What the candidates and campaigns say7%13%15%19%21%25%35%
What you see on social media5%8%14%18%28%26%28%

Survey Details

📋 1,500 US adults 📅 September 16–21, 2026

Verasight collected data for this project from September 16-September 21, 2026. The sample consists of 1,500 United States adults.

The sampling criteria for this survey were:

  1. US resident
  2. Adult (age 18+)

The selection criteria for the final sample were:

  1. Passed all data quality assurance checks, outlined below

The data are weighted to match the August 2026 Current Population Survey on age, race/ethnicity, sex, income, education, region, and metropolitan status, as well as to a running three-year average of partisanship distributions from the Pew Research Center NPORS benchmarking surveys and population benchmarks of 2024 vote. The margin of sampling error, which accounts for the design effect and is calculated using the classical random sampling formula, is +/- 2.6%.

All respondents were recruited via email from the Verasight Community, which is composed of individuals recruited via random address-based sampling, random person-to-person text messaging, and dynamic online targeting. All Verasight community members are verified via multi-step authentication, including providing an SMS response from a mobile phone registered with a major U.S. carrier (e.g., no VOIP or internet phones) as well as within-survey technology, including verifying the absence of non-human responses with technologies such as Google reCAPTCHA v3. Those who exhibit low-quality response behaviors over time, such as straight-lining or speeding, are also removed and prohibited from further participation in the community. Verasight Community members receive points for taking surveys that can be redeemed for Venmo or PayPal payments, gift cards, or charitable donations. Respondents are never routed from one survey to another and receive compensation for every invited survey, so there is never an incentive to respond strategically to survey qualification screener questions.

To further ensure data quality, the Verasight data team implements a number of post-data collection quality assurance procedures, including confirming that all responses correspond with U.S. IP addresses, confirming no duplicate respondents, verifying the absence of non-human responses, and removing any respondents who failed in-survey attention and/or straight-lining checks. The Verasight data team also reviewed open-ended items to ensure no responses contained nonsensical, inappropriate, or non-sequitur text. Respondents that completed the survey in less than 30% of the median completion time were removed. ​​

Unmeasured error in this or any other survey may exist. Verasight is a member of the American Association for Public Opinion Research Transparency Initiative.

Reading the crosstabs

Crosstab figures are weighted column percentages. Respondents with no value on a banner variable are left out of that banner’s columns. Subgroup estimates carry wider margins of error than the full sample’s ±2.6 percentage points.

Percentages are rounded to whole numbers and may not sum to 100. Figures in the key takeaways are computed from unrounded values, so a figure can differ from the sum of the displayed rows by one point.